Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MICDX
FHKTX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$49.75
Change+$0.63 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FHKTX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MICDX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICDX (99.4M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MICDX (2.99) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKTX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.73 vs. FHKTX (43.50). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.89 vs. MICDX (1.96).
| FHKTX | MICDX | FHKTX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.19 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.19 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.093 | 28.992 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 2.99 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.50 | 49.73 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.39 | 23.33 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.89 | 1.96 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.80 | 48.14 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement