Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MICDX
FHKTX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$46.53
Change-$0.37 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
FHKTX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MICDX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MICDX (95.7M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MICDX (3.18) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKTX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKTX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.46 vs. FHKTX (31.32). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -0.77 vs. MICDX (-6.63).
| FHKTX | MICDX | FHKTX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.19 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.19 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.259 | 23.467 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.7M | 1,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 3.18 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.32 | 40.46 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.94 | 17.36 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.77 | -6.63 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.47 | 42.97 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement