Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MCHFX
FHKTX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$58.17
Change-$0.91 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.42
Change-$0.11 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.76M
FHKTX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MCHFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. MCHFX (426M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MCHFX (1.30) vs FHKTX (1.15). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKTX (18 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKTX (34.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKTX (250) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.26 vs. MCHFX (26.96). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -0.88 vs. MCHFX (-41.31).
| FHKTX | MCHFX | FHKTX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.25 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.25 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.865 | 1.220 | 890% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 426M | 486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.30 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.26 | 26.96 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.49 | 11.76 | 591% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.88 | -41.31 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.99 | 29.78 | 661% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement