Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs MCHFX
FHKTX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.41
Change+$0.39 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.55
Change+$0.17 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.34M
FHKTX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. MCHFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MCHFX (436M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: MCHFX (1.47) vs FHKTX (0.80). FHKTX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKTX (18 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKTX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.22 vs. MCHFX (28.10). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 3.29 vs. MCHFX (-29.78).
| FHKTX | MCHFX | FHKTX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.25 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.25 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.343 | 30.580 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 436M | 399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.47 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.22 | 28.10 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.62 | 21.63 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.29 | -29.78 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.80 | 2.56 | 4,490% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement