Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs LNGZX
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.35
Change-$0.30 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$48.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. LNGZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. LNGZX (52.5M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: LNGZX (0.87) vs FHKTX (0.78). FHKTX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKTX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). FHKTX (1.43) and LNGZX (1.39) have similar cost to investors . LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKTX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.46 vs. LNGZX (31.00). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.93 vs. LNGZX (-36.25).
| FHKTX | LNGZX | FHKTX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.24 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.39 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.999 | 31.760 | 129% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 52.5M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.87 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.46 | 31.00 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.03 | 41.62 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.93 | -36.25 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.79 | 26.40 | 329% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement