Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs LNGZX
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$59.08
Change+$4.17 (+7.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.18
Change-$3.72 (-7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FHKTX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. LNGZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. LNGZX (49.9M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: LNGZX (1.81) vs FHKTX (1.15). FHKTX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKTX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.49) and FHKTX (1.43) have similar cost to investors . LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKTX (34.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKTX (250) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.15 vs. LNGZX (28.32). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. LNGZX (-44.11).
| FHKTX | LNGZX | FHKTX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.24 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.49 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.865 | 2.232 | 487% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.81 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.15 | 28.32 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.49 | 7.66 | 907% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.83 | -44.11 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.99 | 55.34 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement