Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSAIX
FHKTX vs GSAIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$49.75
Change+$0.63 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$27.79
Change+$0.20 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
FHKTX vs GSAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSAIX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAIX (39.1M). GSAIX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSAIX (1.24) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAIX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSAIX (30 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: FHKTX (0) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.81 vs. FHKTX (43.60). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 2.89 vs. GSAIX (-21.99).
| FHKTX | GSAIX | FHKTX / GSAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.10 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.94 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.359 | 29.896 | 92% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.1M | 3,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.24 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.60 | 49.81 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.26 | 16.64 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.89 | -21.99 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.26 | 44.02 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement