Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSAIX
FHKTX vs GSAIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAIX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.41
Change+$0.39 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$28.09
Change+$0.22 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.7M
FHKTX vs GSAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSAIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. GSAIX (40.7M). GSAIX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSAIX (1.19) vs FHKTX (0.80). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAIX: FHKTX (18 years) vs GSAIX (30 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: FHKTX (0) vs GSAIX (1000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.33 vs. GSAIX (30.17). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 3.29 vs. GSAIX (-27.89).
| FHKTX | GSAIX | FHKTX / GSAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.10 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.94 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.343 | 32.250 | 122% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 40.7M | 4,273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.19 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.33 | 30.17 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.67 | 21.07 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.29 | -27.89 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.45 | 37.04 | 306% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement