Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSAFX
FHKTX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$46.53
Change-$0.37 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.90
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.53M
FHKTX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSAFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAFX (36.5M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSAFX (1.36) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSAFX (7 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKTX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.03 vs. FHKTX (29.53). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 1.54 vs. GSAFX (-27.08).
| FHKTX | GSAFX | FHKTX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.09 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.93 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.074 | 21.277 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36.5M | 3,575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.53 | 36.03 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 5.69 | 877% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.54 | -27.08 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.64 | N/A | - |