Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSAFX
FHKTX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$49.75
Change+$0.63 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.68
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
FHKTX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSAFX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAFX (39.1M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSAFX (1.25) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKTX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.05 vs. FHKTX (43.50). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.89 vs. GSAFX (-20.39).
| FHKTX | GSAFX | FHKTX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.09 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.93 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.093 | 30.875 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.1M | 3,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.50 | 51.05 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.39 | 17.48 | 334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.89 | -20.39 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement