Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSAEX
FHKTX vs GSAEX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAEX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$46.53
Change-$0.37 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$25.83
Change+$0.25 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.53M
FHKTX vs GSAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSAEX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Buy and GSAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAEX (36.5M). GSAEX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: GSAEX (1.31) vs FHKTX (0.93). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAEX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSAEX (11 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX (0) and GSAEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.86 vs. FHKTX (29.53). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 1.54 vs. GSAEX (-27.41).
| FHKTX | GSAEX | FHKTX / GSAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.21 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.05 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.074 | 21.175 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36.5M | 3,575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.31 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.53 | 35.86 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 5.42 | 921% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.54 | -27.41 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.64 | 34.99 | 228% |