Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKTX vs GSACX
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$53.35
Change-$0.30 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.53
Change-$0.19 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.92M
FHKTX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs. GSACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Hold and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. GSACX (40.9M). FHKTX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKTX (0.78) vs GSACX (0.24). FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKTX (17 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKTX (0) vs GSACX (1000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.71 vs. GSACX (31.12). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.33 vs. GSACX (-31.84).
| FHKTX | GSACX | FHKTX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.21 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 3.05 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.210 | 32.452 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 40.9M | 3,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.24 | 325% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.71 | 31.12 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.90 | 34.85 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.33 | -31.84 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.74 | 20.17 | 425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement