Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs TCELX
FHKIX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs TCELX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$49.98
Change+$0.66 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$13.68
Change+$0.05 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.93M
FHKIX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. TCELX (60.9M). FHKIX (1.15) and TCELX (1.12) have matching dividends . FHKIX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKIX (17 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKIX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.35 vs. TCELX (41.25). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.00 vs. TCELX (-0.44).
| FHKIX | TCELX | FHKIX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.838 | 26.791 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 60.9M | 2,274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.12 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.35 | 41.25 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.88 | 15.24 | 386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.00 | -0.44 | -1,353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement