Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs RBCRX
FHKIX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs RBCRX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$13.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.04M
FHKIX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. RBCRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. RBCRX (7.04M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: RBCRX (3.32) vs FHKIX (1.66). FHKIX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKIX (18 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKIX (250) vs RBCRX (250000). FHKIX (56.97) and RBCRX (55.55) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FHKIX | RBCRX | FHKIX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.00 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 6.74 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 5.744 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 7.04M | 29,408% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 3.32 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.97 | 55.55 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 37.93 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 40.09 | 519% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement