Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs NGCAX
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.44
Change-$3.38 (-7.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FHKIX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. NGCAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. NGCAX (49.9M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: NGCAX (1.77) vs FHKIX (1.66). FHKIX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKIX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKIX (250) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.97 vs. NGCAX (27.96). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. NGCAX (-44.76).
| FHKIX | NGCAX | FHKIX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.74 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 2.191 | 498% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.77 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.97 | 27.96 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 6.83 | 1,057% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | -44.76 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 50.40 | 412% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement