Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICFX
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$49.32
Change+$1.00 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.21
Change+$0.35 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.75M
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICFX (441M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICFX (1.53) vs FHKIX (1.15). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKIX (0) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.77 vs. FHKIX (40.93). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.59 vs. MICFX (-27.61).
| FHKIX | MICFX | FHKIX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.838 | 28.241 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 441M | 314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.53 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.93 | 56.77 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.06 | 20.02 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.59 | -27.61 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.41 | -2.93 | -3,291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers