Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICFX
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.34M
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MICFX (436M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICFX (1.51) vs FHKIX (1.04). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKIX (0) vs MICFX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.29 vs. MICFX (26.73). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. MICFX (-30.15).
| FHKIX | MICFX | FHKIX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.295 | 29.285 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 436M | 399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.29 | 26.73 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.55 | 24.89 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.78 | -30.15 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.10 | 2.29 | 5,242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement