Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICFX
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.88
Change-$0.56 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Instl
Price$18.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.63M
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MICFX (456M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICFX (1.46) vs FHKIX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKIX (0) vs MICFX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.76 vs. MICFX (29.28). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.80 vs. MICFX (-28.52).
| FHKIX | MICFX | FHKIX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.12 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.624 | 35.246 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 456M | 398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.46 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.76 | 29.28 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.48 | 33.83 | 276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.80 | -28.52 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.42 | -7.17 | -1,386% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement