Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICFX
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.51
Change-$0.77 (-4.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets428.65M
FHKIX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. MICFX (429M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MICFX: FHKIX (1.66) vs MICFX (1.42). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKIX (250) vs MICFX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.97 vs. MICFX (31.07). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. MICFX (-40.50).
| FHKIX | MICFX | FHKIX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 1.921 | 568% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 429M | 483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.42 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.97 | 31.07 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 12.86 | 561% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | -40.50 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 32.45 | 641% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement