Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICDX
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.32
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.94
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MICDX (104M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICDX (2.87) vs FHKIX (1.02). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKIX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.42 vs. MICDX (27.83). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.57 vs. MICDX (-3.31).
| FHKIX | MICDX | FHKIX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.798 | 28.992 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 104M | 1,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 2.87 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.42 | 27.83 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.20 | 37.28 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.57 | -3.31 | -320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.24 | 38.69 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement