Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICDX
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$50.63
Change+$0.65 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICDX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICDX (99.4M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICDX (2.99) vs FHKIX (1.15). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKIX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.73 vs. FHKIX (44.24). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.07 vs. MICDX (1.96).
| FHKIX | MICDX | FHKIX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.549 | 28.992 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.99 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.24 | 49.73 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.00 | 23.33 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.07 | 1.96 | 462% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.39 | 48.14 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement