Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICDX
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.88
Change-$0.56 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.58
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICDX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. MICDX (99.3M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICDX (2.93) vs FHKIX (1.00). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKIX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.76 vs. MICDX (35.98). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.80 vs. MICDX (-1.71).
| FHKIX | MICDX | FHKIX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.624 | 34.950 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 99.3M | 1,826% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.93 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.76 | 35.98 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.48 | 36.84 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.80 | -1.71 | -399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.42 | 45.41 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement