Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MICDX
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.13
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.90
Change+$0.11 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
FHKIX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MICDX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MICDX (97.7M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MICDX (2.93) vs FHKIX (1.04). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKIX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.29 vs. MICDX (27.46). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. MICDX (-7.58).
| FHKIX | MICDX | FHKIX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.295 | 28.647 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 97.7M | 1,780% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 2.93 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.29 | 27.46 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.55 | 16.79 | 432% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.78 | -7.58 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.10 | 41.96 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement