Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCSMX
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$12.85
Change+$0.67 (+5.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCSMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. MCSMX (71.2M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCSMX (2.01) vs FHKIX (1.66). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKIX (250) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.97 vs. MCSMX (42.22). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. MCSMX (-37.09).
| FHKIX | MCSMX | FHKIX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.61 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 12.325 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 71.2M | 2,907% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.01 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.97 | 42.22 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 10.44 | 692% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | -37.09 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 87.69 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement