Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCSMX
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$49.98
Change+$0.66 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCSMX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCSMX (71.6M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: FHKIX (1.15) vs MCSMX (1.04). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKIX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.83 vs. FHKIX (44.35). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.00 vs. MCSMX (-37.40).
| FHKIX | MCSMX | FHKIX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.61 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.838 | 28.304 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 71.6M | 1,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.04 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.35 | 49.83 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.88 | 5.86 | 1,005% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.00 | -37.40 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.83 | 48.78 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement