Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCSMX
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$47.97
Change+$0.15 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.35
Change+$0.27 (+2.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.26M
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCSMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MCSMX (66.3M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: FHKIX (1.21) vs MCSMX (1.14). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKIX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. FHKIX (32.84). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.25 vs. MCSMX (-41.54).
| FHKIX | MCSMX | FHKIX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.40 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.61 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.339 | 25.000 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 66.3M | 1,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.84 | 42.01 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.83 | -5.57 | -877% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.25 | -41.54 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.49 | 37.05 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement