Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCHFX
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.32
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.59
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCHFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MCHFX (475M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCHFX (1.39) vs FHKIX (1.02). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.42 vs. MCHFX (26.83). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.57 vs. MCHFX (-28.82).
| FHKIX | MCHFX | FHKIX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.798 | 30.878 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 475M | 336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.39 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.42 | 26.83 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.20 | 39.29 | 263% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.57 | -28.82 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.24 | -11.84 | -770% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement