Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCHFX
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.79
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.50
Change-$0.08 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.34M
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCHFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MCHFX (436M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCHFX (1.47) vs FHKIX (1.04). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.92 vs. MCHFX (27.99). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.71 vs. MCHFX (-31.93).
| FHKIX | MCHFX | FHKIX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.25 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.425 | 30.208 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 436M | 399% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.47 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.92 | 27.99 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.97 | 15.44 | 453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.71 | -31.93 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.13 | -14.62 | -822% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement