Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCHFX
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCHFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$58.98
Change-$0.92 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.42
Change-$0.11 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.76M
FHKIX vs MCHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCHFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and MCHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. MCHFX (426M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than MCHFX: FHKIX (1.66) vs MCHFX (1.30). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCHFX: FHKIX (18 years) vs MCHFX (28 years). MCHFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). MCHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCHFX: FHKIX (250) vs MCHFX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.03 vs. MCHFX (26.96). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.03 vs. MCHFX (-41.31).
| FHKIX | MCHFX | FHKIX / MCHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.25 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.25 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 1.220 | 894% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 426M | 486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.30 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.03 | 26.96 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 11.76 | 614% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.03 | -41.31 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 29.78 | 698% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement