Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCDFX
FHKIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$50.63
Change+$0.65 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FHKIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCDFX (99.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCDFX (2.90) vs FHKIX (1.15). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.42 vs. FHKIX (44.35). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.00 vs. MCDFX (-0.40).
| FHKIX | MCDFX | FHKIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.838 | 28.279 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 2.90 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.35 | 48.42 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.88 | 22.28 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.00 | -0.40 | -1,501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.83 | 45.29 | 203% |