Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs MCDFX
FHKIX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$47.72
Change-$0.31 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.25
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
FHKIX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MCDFX (95.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCDFX (3.08) vs FHKIX (1.21). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FHKIX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.34 vs. FHKIX (30.23). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.62 vs. MCDFX (-6.19).
| FHKIX | MCDFX | FHKIX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.32 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.495 | 23.179 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.7M | 1,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 3.08 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.23 | 37.34 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.42 | 16.73 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.62 | -6.19 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.03 | 40.67 | 209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement