Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs LNGZX
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.18
Change-$3.72 (-7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. LNGZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. LNGZX (49.9M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: LNGZX (1.81) vs FHKIX (1.66). FHKIX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKIX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKIX (250) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.97 vs. LNGZX (28.32). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. LNGZX (-44.11).
| FHKIX | LNGZX | FHKIX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.24 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.49 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 2.232 | 489% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.81 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.97 | 28.32 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 7.66 | 943% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | -44.11 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 55.34 | 376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement