Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs LNGZX
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.32
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$48.58
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.49M
FHKIX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. LNGZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. LNGZX (52.5M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKIX (1.02) vs LNGZX (0.87). FHKIX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKIX (17 years) vs LNGZX (28 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKIX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.19 vs. LNGZX (31.00). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 11.20 vs. LNGZX (-36.25).
| FHKIX | LNGZX | FHKIX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.602 | 31.760 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 52.5M | 3,042% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.87 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.19 | 31.00 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.36 | 41.62 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.20 | -36.25 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.33 | 26.40 | 350% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement