Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs HLMCX
FHKIX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs HLMCX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$50.63
Change+$0.65 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.56
Change+$0.04 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.43M
FHKIX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. HLMCX (3.43M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: FHKIX (1.15) vs HLMCX (0.94). FHKIX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKIX (17 years) vs HLMCX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKIX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKIX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.35 vs. HLMCX (41.21).
| FHKIX | HLMCX | FHKIX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.16 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 4.12 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.838 | 23.019 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 3.43M | 40,355% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.94 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.35 | 41.21 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.88 | 2.21 | 2,666% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.00 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers