Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAGX
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$26.67
Change-$0.50 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and GSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GSAGX (42.2M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than GSAGX: FHKIX (1.66) vs GSAGX (1.27). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FHKIX (18 years) vs GSAGX (32 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FHKIX (250) vs GSAGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.97 vs. GSAGX (36.12). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. GSAGX (-37.78).
| FHKIX | GSAGX | FHKIX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.46 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.30 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 4.261 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.27 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.97 | 36.12 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 16.18 | 446% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | -37.78 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 52.82 | 394% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement