Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAGX
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAGX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.13
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Goldman Sachs China Equity A
Price$25.87
Change+$0.20 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.7M
FHKIX vs GSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and GSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. GSAGX (40.7M). GSAGX (1.06) and FHKIX (1.04) have matching dividends . FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAGX: FHKIX (18 years) vs GSAGX (31 years). GSAGX (2.30) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAGX: FHKIX (0) vs GSAGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.16 vs. GSAGX (29.93). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. GSAGX (-29.28).
| FHKIX | GSAGX | FHKIX / GSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.46 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.30 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.295 | 32.057 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 40.7M | 4,273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.06 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.16 | 29.93 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.39 | 19.99 | 347% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.78 | -29.28 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.48 | 30.88 | 393% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement