Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAFX
FHKIX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$50.63
Change+$0.65 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.68
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
FHKIX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAFX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAFX (39.1M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: GSAFX (1.25) vs FHKIX (1.15). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKIX (17 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKIX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.05 vs. FHKIX (44.24). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.07 vs. GSAFX (-20.39).
| FHKIX | GSAFX | FHKIX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.549 | 30.875 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.1M | 3,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.25 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.24 | 51.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.00 | 17.48 | 349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.07 | -20.39 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement