Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAEX
FHKIX vs GSAEX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAEX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$47.34
Change-$0.38 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$25.83
Change+$0.25 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.53M
FHKIX vs GSAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAEX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and GSAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAEX (36.5M). GSAEX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: GSAEX (1.31) vs FHKIX (1.21). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAEX: FHKIX (17 years) vs GSAEX (11 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX (0) and GSAEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.86 vs. FHKIX (30.23). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.62 vs. GSAEX (-27.41).
| FHKIX | GSAEX | FHKIX / GSAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.21 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.495 | 21.175 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36.5M | 3,575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.23 | 35.86 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.42 | 5.42 | 967% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.62 | -27.41 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.03 | 34.99 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers