Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSAEX
FHKIX vs GSAEX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSAEX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$54.32
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Goldman Sachs China Equity I
Price$28.18
Change-$0.24 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.92M
FHKIX vs GSAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSAEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and GSAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. GSAEX (40.9M). GSAEX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: GSAEX (1.10) vs FHKIX (1.02). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSAEX: FHKIX (17 years) vs GSAEX (12 years). GSAEX (2.05) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX (0) and GSAEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.42 vs. GSAEX (32.42). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.57 vs. GSAEX (-26.66).
| FHKIX | GSAEX | FHKIX / GSAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.21 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.798 | 33.491 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 40.9M | 3,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.42 | 32.42 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.20 | 38.94 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.57 | -26.66 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.24 | 37.58 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement