Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSACX
FHKIX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.38M
FHKIX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Buy and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. GSACX (40.4M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKIX (1.04) vs GSACX (0.25). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKIX (18 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKIX (0) vs GSACX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. GSACX (27.99). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.48 vs. GSACX (-32.99).
| FHKIX | GSACX | FHKIX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.21 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 3.05 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.906 | 30.100 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 40.4M | 4,304% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.25 | 410% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.91 | 27.99 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.07 | 20.41 | 353% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.48 | -32.99 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.49 | 17.60 | 679% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement