Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKIX vs GSACX
FHKIX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs GSACX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.98
Change-$0.47 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
FHKIX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs. GSACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Hold and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GSACX (42.2M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKIX (1.66) vs GSACX (1.24). FHKIX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKIX (18 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKIX (250) vs GSACX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.97 vs. GSACX (35.15). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. GSACX (-40.60).
| FHKIX | GSACX | FHKIX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.21 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 3.05 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.905 | 4.218 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.24 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.97 | 35.15 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.20 | 13.64 | 529% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | -40.60 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.86 | 38.47 | 540% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement