Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKFX vs RNWBX
FHKFX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FHKFX vs RNWBX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets
Price$11.65
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.43B
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
FHKFX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKFX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKFX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. FHKFX (6.43B). FHKFX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FHKFX (2.13) vs RNWBX (0.12). FHKFX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FHKFX (7 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FHKFX (0.03). FHKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). FHKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FHKFX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FHKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.15 vs. RNWBX (18.68). FHKFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.81 vs. RNWBX (7.66).
| FHKFX | RNWBX | FHKFX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.67 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.67 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.871 | 20.612 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.43B | 75.3B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 0.12 | 1,802% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.15 | 18.68 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.62 | 40.84 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.81 | 7.66 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers