Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs TCELX
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs TCELX
Fidelity China Region
Price$55.31
Change-$0.57 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$14.33
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. TCELX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. TCELX (63.5M). TCELX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: TCELX (1.09) vs FHKCX (0.96). FHKCX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKCX (30 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKCX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.75 vs. TCELX (29.59). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.90 vs. TCELX (-6.54).
| FHKCX | TCELX | FHKCX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.610 | 32.837 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 63.5M | 2,855% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.09 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.75 | 29.59 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.38 | 31.98 | 292% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.90 | -6.54 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.92 | N/A | - |