Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs TCELX
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs TCELX
Fidelity China Region
Price$50.38
Change+$0.68 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$13.68
Change+$0.05 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.93M
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. TCELX (60.9M). TCELX (1.12) and FHKCX (1.11) have matching dividends . FHKCX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKCX (30 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKCX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.31 vs. TCELX (41.25). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.09 vs. TCELX (-0.44).
| FHKCX | TCELX | FHKCX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.796 | 26.791 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 60.9M | 2,274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.12 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.31 | 41.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.81 | 15.24 | 386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.09 | -0.44 | -1,374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement