Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs TCELX
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs TCELX
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.60
Change+$0.39 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$14.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. TCELX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. TCELX (62.5M). TCELX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: TCELX (1.09) vs FHKCX (1.00). FHKCX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKCX (30 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKCX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.41 vs. TCELX (33.98). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.92 vs. TCELX (-6.11).
| FHKCX | TCELX | FHKCX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.393 | 34.605 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 62.5M | 2,782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.09 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.41 | 33.98 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.63 | 27.72 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | -6.11 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement