Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs TCELX
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs TCELX
Fidelity China Region
Price$58.81
Change+$0.29 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$15.31
Change+$0.14 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
FHKCX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. TCELX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. TCELX (66.9M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than TCELX: FHKCX (1.75) vs TCELX (1.11). FHKCX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKCX (30 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKCX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.94 vs. TCELX (48.73). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.28 vs. TCELX (-6.57).
| FHKCX | TCELX | FHKCX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.40 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.416 | 6.098 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 66.9M | 2,677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.11 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.94 | 48.73 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.51 | 21.93 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.28 | -6.57 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement