Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs RBCRX
FHKCX vs RBCRX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs RBCRX
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.75
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
RBC China Equity R6
Price$12.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62M
FHKCX vs RBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. RBCRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and RBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. RBCRX (6.62M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: RBCRX (1.35) vs FHKCX (0.98). FHKCX was incepted earlier than RBCRX: FHKCX (30 years) vs RBCRX (4 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCRX: FHKCX (0) vs RBCRX (250000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.15 vs. FHKCX (34.40).
| FHKCX | RBCRX | FHKCX / RBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.00 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 6.74 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.782 | 48.000 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 6.62M | 24,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.35 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.40 | 42.15 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.11 | 60.84 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.67 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.74 | 31.88 | 288% |