Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs NGCAX
FHKCX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs NGCAX
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.60
Change+$0.39 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.23
Change+$0.46 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.51M
FHKCX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. NGCAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. NGCAX (50.5M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than NGCAX: FHKCX (1.00) vs NGCAX (0.86). FHKCX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKCX (30 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKCX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.28 vs. NGCAX (25.05). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.92 vs. NGCAX (-36.06).
| FHKCX | NGCAX | FHKCX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.49 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.393 | 27.008 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 50.5M | 3,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.86 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.28 | 25.05 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.50 | 13.28 | 523% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | -36.06 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.97 | 22.63 | 539% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement