Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs NGCAX
FHKCX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs NGCAX
Fidelity China Region
Price$60.43
Change+$4.08 (+7.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.44
Change-$3.38 (-7.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FHKCX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. NGCAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. NGCAX (49.9M). NGCAX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: NGCAX (1.77) vs FHKCX (1.58). FHKCX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKCX (30 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKCX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.96 vs. NGCAX (27.96). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.14 vs. NGCAX (-44.76).
| FHKCX | NGCAX | FHKCX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.49 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.74 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.921 | 2.191 | 498% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.96 | 27.96 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.17 | 6.83 | 1,057% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.14 | -44.76 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.30 | 50.40 | 413% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement