Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICFX
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$48.35
Change+$0.16 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Instl
Price$16.63
Change+$0.18 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.14M
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MICFX (400M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICFX (1.66) vs FHKCX (1.17). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKCX (0) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.35 vs. FHKCX (32.85). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.34 vs. MICFX (-26.87).
| FHKCX | MICFX | FHKCX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.325 | 23.920 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 400M | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.66 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.85 | 49.35 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.76 | 10.23 | 477% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.34 | -26.87 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.93 | -14.59 | -472% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement