Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICFX
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.75
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.59
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MICFX (475M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICFX (1.43) vs FHKCX (0.98). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKCX (0) vs MICFX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.40 vs. MICFX (27.07). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.67 vs. MICFX (-28.36).
| FHKCX | MICFX | FHKCX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.782 | 31.073 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 475M | 336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 1.43 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.40 | 27.07 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.11 | 39.82 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.67 | -28.36 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.74 | -10.61 | -865% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement