Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICFX
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$49.70
Change+$1.00 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.21
Change+$0.35 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.75M
FHKCX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICFX (441M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICFX (1.53) vs FHKCX (1.11). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICFX (15 years). MICFX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKCX (0) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.77 vs. FHKCX (40.88). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.67 vs. MICFX (-27.61).
| FHKCX | MICFX | FHKCX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.12 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.796 | 28.241 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 441M | 314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.53 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.88 | 56.77 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | 20.02 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | -27.61 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.90 | -2.93 | -3,308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers