Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICDX
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICDX
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.22
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.12
Change-$0.11 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICDX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MICDX (97.7M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICDX (2.93) vs FHKCX (1.00). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKCX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.91 vs. MICDX (33.75). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.77 vs. MICDX (-4.63).
| FHKCX | MICDX | FHKCX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.419 | 31.842 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 97.7M | 1,780% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.93 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.91 | 33.75 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.94 | 22.08 | 317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.77 | -4.63 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.46 | 40.48 | 298% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement