Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICDX
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICDX
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.71
Change-$0.38 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICDX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MICDX (95.7M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICDX (3.18) vs FHKCX (1.17). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKCX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.46 vs. FHKCX (31.99). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.32 vs. MICDX (-6.63).
| FHKCX | MICDX | FHKCX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.656 | 23.467 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.7M | 1,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 3.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.99 | 40.46 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.35 | 17.36 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.32 | -6.63 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.27 | 42.97 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement