Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MICDX
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MICDX
Fidelity China Region
Price$51.03
Change+$0.65 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FHKCX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MICDX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICDX (99.4M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MICDX (2.99) vs FHKCX (1.11). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKCX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.73 vs. FHKCX (44.21). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.19 vs. MICDX (1.96).
| FHKCX | MICDX | FHKCX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.545 | 28.992 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 2.99 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.21 | 49.73 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | 23.33 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | 1.96 | 468% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.89 | 48.14 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement