Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MCDFX
FHKCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MCDFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$48.09
Change-$0.32 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.25
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
FHKCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MCDFX (95.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MCDFX (3.08) vs FHKCX (1.17). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FHKCX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.34 vs. FHKCX (30.23). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.70 vs. MCDFX (-6.19).
| FHKCX | MCDFX | FHKCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.479 | 23.179 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.7M | 1,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 3.08 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.23 | 37.34 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.36 | 16.73 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.70 | -6.19 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.49 | 40.67 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement