Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs MCDFX
FHKCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs MCDFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$51.03
Change+$0.65 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FHKCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCDFX (99.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: MCDFX (2.90) vs FHKCX (1.11). FHKCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FHKCX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.42 vs. FHKCX (44.31). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.09 vs. MCDFX (-0.40).
| FHKCX | MCDFX | FHKCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.796 | 28.279 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 2.90 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.31 | 48.42 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.81 | 22.28 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.09 | -0.40 | -1,524% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.26 | 45.29 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement