Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs LNGZX
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs LNGZX
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.21
Change+$0.15 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$46.93
Change+$0.51 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.97M
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. LNGZX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. LNGZX (50M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FHKCX (1.00) vs LNGZX (0.94). FHKCX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKCX (30 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKCX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.41 vs. LNGZX (23.95). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.92 vs. LNGZX (-36.05).
| FHKCX | LNGZX | FHKCX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.39 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.393 | 25.902 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 50M | 3,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.41 | 23.95 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.63 | 16.47 | 441% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | -36.05 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.51 | 24.66 | 489% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement