Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs LNGZX
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs LNGZX
Fidelity China Region
Price$60.43
Change+$4.08 (+7.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.18
Change-$3.72 (-7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FHKCX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. LNGZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. LNGZX (49.9M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: LNGZX (1.81) vs FHKCX (1.58). FHKCX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKCX (30 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKCX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.96 vs. LNGZX (28.32). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.14 vs. LNGZX (-44.11).
| FHKCX | LNGZX | FHKCX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.49 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.921 | 2.232 | 489% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.81 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.96 | 28.32 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.17 | 7.66 | 942% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.14 | -44.11 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.30 | 55.34 | 376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement