Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs ICHKX
FHKCX vs ICHKX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs ICHKX
Fidelity China Region
Price$60.43
Change+$4.08 (+7.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
Price$16.97
Change+$0.30 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.54M
FHKCX vs ICHKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. ICHKX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and ICHKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. ICHKX (27.5M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than ICHKX: FHKCX (1.58) vs ICHKX (1.00). FHKCX was incepted earlier than ICHKX: FHKCX (30 years) vs ICHKX (32 years). ICHKX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. ICHKX (8.63). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICHKX: FHKCX (0) vs ICHKX (5000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.96 vs. ICHKX (35.24). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.14 vs. ICHKX (-41.16).
| FHKCX | ICHKX | FHKCX / ICHKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.94 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.94 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.921 | 4.367 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 27.5M | 7,527% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.00 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.96 | 35.24 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.17 | 4.32 | 1,669% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.14 | -41.16 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.30 | 13.83 | 1,506% |