Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSAIX
FHKCX vs GSAIX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSAIX
Fidelity China Region
Price$51.03
Change+$0.65 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
Price$27.79
Change+$0.20 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
FHKCX vs GSAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSAIX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and GSAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAIX (39.1M). GSAIX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: GSAIX (1.24) vs FHKCX (1.11). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSAIX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSAIX (30 years). GSAIX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAIX: FHKCX (0) vs GSAIX (1000000). GSAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.81 vs. FHKCX (44.31). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.09 vs. GSAIX (-21.99).
| FHKCX | GSAIX | FHKCX / GSAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.10 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.94 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.796 | 29.896 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.1M | 3,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.24 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.31 | 49.81 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.81 | 16.64 | 354% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.09 | -21.99 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.26 | 44.02 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement