Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSAFX
FHKCX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSAFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$51.03
Change+$0.65 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.68
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
FHKCX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSAFX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAFX (39.1M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: GSAFX (1.25) vs FHKCX (1.11). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKCX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.05 vs. FHKCX (44.21). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.19 vs. GSAFX (-20.39).
| FHKCX | GSAFX | FHKCX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.545 | 30.875 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.1M | 3,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.25 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.21 | 51.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | 17.48 | 349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | -20.39 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement