Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSAFX
FHKCX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSAFX
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.71
Change-$0.38 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.90
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.53M
FHKCX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSAFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAFX (36.5M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: GSAFX (1.36) vs FHKCX (1.17). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSAFX (7 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKCX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.03 vs. FHKCX (30.23). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.70 vs. GSAFX (-27.08).
| FHKCX | GSAFX | FHKCX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.479 | 21.277 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36.5M | 3,575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.36 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.23 | 36.03 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.36 | 5.69 | 920% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.70 | -27.08 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers