Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GSACX
FHKCX vs GSACX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GSACX
Fidelity China Region
Price$60.43
Change+$4.08 (+7.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity C
Price$22.98
Change-$0.47 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
FHKCX vs GSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GSACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Hold and GSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GSACX (42.2M). FHKCX pays higher dividends than GSACX: FHKCX (1.58) vs GSACX (1.24). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GSACX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GSACX (28 years). GSACX (3.05) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSACX: FHKCX (0) vs GSACX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.96 vs. GSACX (35.15). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.14 vs. GSACX (-40.60).
| FHKCX | GSACX | FHKCX / GSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 2.21 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 3.05 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.921 | 4.218 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.24 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.96 | 35.15 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.17 | 13.64 | 529% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.14 | -40.60 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.30 | 38.47 | 541% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement