Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKCX vs GMEPX
FHKCX vs GMEPX Comparison
Open Charts FHKCX vs GMEPX
Fidelity China Region
Price$51.03
Change+$0.65 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$27.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
FHKCX vs GMEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKCX vs. GMEPX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKCX is a Buy and GMEPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GMEPX (39.3M). GMEPX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: GMEPX (1.25) vs FHKCX (1.11). FHKCX was incepted earlier than GMEPX: FHKCX (30 years) vs GMEPX (7 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). GMEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX (0) and GMEPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.76 vs. FHKCX (44.31). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.09 vs. GMEPX (-21.99).
| FHKCX | GMEPX | FHKCX / GMEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.796 | 29.915 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.3M | 3,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.31 | 49.76 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.81 | 16.62 | 354% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.09 | -21.99 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers