Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs TCELX
FHKAX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs TCELX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$59.52
Change+$4.06 (+7.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$15.88
Change+$1.49 (+10.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
FHKAX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. TCELX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and TCELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. TCELX (66.9M). FHKAX pays higher dividends than TCELX: FHKAX (1.44) vs TCELX (1.01). FHKAX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKAX (18 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKAX (250) vs TCELX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.55 vs. TCELX (49.52). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. TCELX (-9.19).
| FHKAX | TCELX | FHKAX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 2.11 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.879 | 10.049 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 66.9M | 3,094% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.01 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.55 | 49.52 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.73 | 27.34 | 259% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | -9.19 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement