Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs TCELX
FHKAX vs TCELX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs TCELX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$46.47
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity
Price$12.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.87M
FHKAX vs TCELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. TCELX (52.9M). TCELX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: TCELX (1.29) vs FHKAX (1.07). FHKAX was incepted earlier than TCELX: FHKAX (17 years) vs TCELX (6 years). TCELX (2.67) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). TCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCELX: FHKAX (0) vs TCELX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.63 vs. TCELX (29.01). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.21 vs. TCELX (-6.56).
| FHKAX | TCELX | FHKAX / TCELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 2.67 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.246 | 16.279 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 52.9M | 2,336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.29 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.63 | 29.01 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.20 | 2.88 | 1,537% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.21 | -6.56 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement