Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs RCEAX
FHKAX vs RCEAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs RCEAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$47.61
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
RBC China Equity A
Price$10.93
Change+$0.09 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.66M
FHKAX vs RCEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. RCEAX (5.66M). RCEAX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: RCEAX (1.43) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than RCEAX: FHKAX (17 years) vs RCEAX (3 years). RCEAX (7.55) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). RCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (6%) and RCEAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCEAX: FHKAX (0) vs RCEAX (1000). RCEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.35 vs. FHKAX (32.50).
| FHKAX | RCEAX | FHKAX / RCEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.30 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 7.55 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.114 | 28.437 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 5.66M | 23,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.43 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.50 | 39.35 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.52 | 18.54 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.66 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement