Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs RCEAX
FHKAX vs RCEAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs RCEAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$49.60
Change+$0.66 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
RBC China Equity A
Price$11.75
Change+$0.41 (+3.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.05M
FHKAX vs RCEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. RCEAX (6.06M). RCEAX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: RCEAX (1.30) vs FHKAX (0.97). FHKAX was incepted earlier than RCEAX: FHKAX (17 years) vs RCEAX (3 years). RCEAX (7.70) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). RCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (6%) and RCEAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCEAX: FHKAX (0) vs RCEAX (1000). RCEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.77 vs. FHKAX (43.97).
| FHKAX | RCEAX | FHKAX / RCEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.30 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 7.70 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.581 | 36.310 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 6.06M | 22,874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.30 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.97 | 49.77 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.49 | 30.02 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.39 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement