Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$54.43
Change-$0.56 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$44.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. NGCAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. NGCAX (53M). FHKAX (0.85) and NGCAX (0.83) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKAX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (6%) and NGCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKAX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.37 vs. NGCAX (34.69). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.18 vs. NGCAX (-37.26).
| FHKAX | NGCAX | FHKAX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.64 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.274 | 33.714 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 53M | 3,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.37 | 34.69 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.79 | 38.69 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.18 | -37.26 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.38 | 25.97 | 371% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement