Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.78
Change-$0.30 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.78M
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. NGCAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and NGCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. NGCAX (50.8M). FHKAX (0.88) and NGCAX (0.86) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKAX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (6%) and NGCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKAX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.62 vs. NGCAX (33.11). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.35 vs. NGCAX (-38.38).
| FHKAX | NGCAX | FHKAX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.64 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.338 | 30.556 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 50.8M | 3,423% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.62 | 33.11 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.89 | 20.64 | 334% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.35 | -38.38 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.75 | 18.86 | 619% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement