Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs NGCAX
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs NGCAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.80
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Columbia Greater China A
Price$42.23
Change+$0.46 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.51M
FHKAX vs NGCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. NGCAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and NGCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. NGCAX (50.5M). FHKAX (0.88) and NGCAX (0.86) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than NGCAX: FHKAX (18 years) vs NGCAX (29 years). NGCAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). NGCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (6%) and NGCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGCAX: FHKAX (0) vs NGCAX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.12 vs. NGCAX (25.05). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.43 vs. NGCAX (-36.06).
| FHKAX | NGCAX | FHKAX / NGCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.64 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.234 | 27.008 | 145% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 50.5M | 3,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.86 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.12 | 25.05 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.35 | 13.28 | 515% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.43 | -36.06 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.04 | 22.63 | 522% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement