Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MICFX
FHKAX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$48.94
Change+$1.00 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Instl
Price$17.21
Change+$0.35 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.75M
FHKAX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MICFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICFX (441M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MICFX (1.53) vs FHKAX (0.97). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MICFX (15 years). FHKAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKAX (0) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.77 vs. FHKAX (40.54). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.00 vs. MICFX (-27.61).
| FHKAX | MICFX | FHKAX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.12 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.12 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.581 | 28.241 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 441M | 314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.53 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.54 | 56.77 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.63 | 20.02 | 298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.00 | -27.61 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.39 | -2.93 | -3,188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement