Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MICFX
FHKAX vs MICFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MICFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$47.61
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Instl
Price$16.63
Change+$0.18 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.14M
FHKAX vs MICFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MICFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MICFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MICFX (400M). MICFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MICFX (1.66) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MICFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MICFX (15 years). FHKAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than MICFX (1.12). MICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.99 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICFX: FHKAX (0) vs MICFX (100000). MICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.35 vs. FHKAX (32.50). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.66 vs. MICFX (-26.87).
| FHKAX | MICFX | FHKAX / MICFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.12 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.12 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.114 | 23.920 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 400M | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.66 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.50 | 49.35 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.52 | 10.23 | 465% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.66 | -26.87 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.88 | -14.59 | -451% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement