Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MICDX
FHKAX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$50.24
Change+$0.64 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FHKAX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MICDX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MICDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MICDX (99.4M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MICDX (2.99) vs FHKAX (0.97). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKAX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.73 vs. FHKAX (43.86). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.42 vs. MICDX (1.96).
| FHKAX | MICDX | FHKAX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.19 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.19 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.301 | 28.992 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 2.99 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.86 | 49.73 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.62 | 23.33 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.42 | 1.96 | 378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.40 | 48.14 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement