Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MICDX
FHKAX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.94
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
FHKAX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MICDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MICDX (104M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MICDX (2.87) vs FHKAX (0.86). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKAX (0) vs MICDX (100000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.06 vs. MICDX (27.83). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.88 vs. MICDX (-3.31).
| FHKAX | MICDX | FHKAX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.19 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.19 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.485 | 28.992 | 140% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 104M | 1,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 2.87 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.06 | 27.83 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.45 | 37.28 | 272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.88 | -3.31 | -269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.33 | 38.69 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement