Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MICDX
FHKAX vs MICDX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MICDX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$46.98
Change-$0.38 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$14.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
FHKAX vs MICDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MICDX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MICDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MICDX (95.7M). MICDX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MICDX (3.18) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MICDX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MICDX (15 years). MICDX (1.19) and FHKAX (1.18) have similar cost to investors . MICDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICDX: FHKAX (0) vs MICDX (100000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.46 vs. FHKAX (31.66). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.67 vs. MICDX (-6.63).
| FHKAX | MICDX | FHKAX / MICDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.19 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.19 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.462 | 23.467 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.7M | 1,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 3.18 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.66 | 40.46 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.12 | 17.36 | 289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.67 | -6.63 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.01 | 42.97 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement