Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$57.69
Change-$0.39 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$12.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.03M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. MCSMX (65M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (2.23) vs FHKAX (1.59). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.50 vs. MCSMX (41.20). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.44 vs. MCSMX (-38.28).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.197 | 5.245 | 156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 65M | 2,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.23 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.50 | 41.20 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.37 | 3.06 | 2,169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.44 | -38.28 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.83 | 74.05 | 254% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement