Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$59.52
Change+$4.06 (+7.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$12.85
Change+$0.67 (+5.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. MCSMX (71.2M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (2.01) vs FHKAX (1.44). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (250) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.55 vs. MCSMX (42.22). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. MCSMX (-37.09).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.879 | 12.325 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 71.2M | 2,907% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.01 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.55 | 42.22 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.73 | 10.44 | 678% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | -37.09 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.36 | 87.69 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement