Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$49.60
Change+$0.66 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCSMX (71.6M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (1.04) vs FHKAX (0.97). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.83 vs. FHKAX (43.97). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.39 vs. MCSMX (-37.40).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.581 | 28.304 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 71.6M | 1,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.97 | 49.83 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.49 | 5.86 | 982% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.39 | -37.40 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.86 | 48.78 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement