Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.34
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.23M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MCSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. MCSMX (68.2M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (1.07) vs FHKAX (0.88). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (18 years) vs MCSMX (15 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.62 vs. MCSMX (29.41). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.35 vs. MCSMX (-41.67).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.338 | 27.974 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 68.2M | 2,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.62 | 29.41 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.89 | 6.96 | 989% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.35 | -41.67 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.75 | 34.02 | 343% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement