Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.49
Change-$0.32 (-2.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.74M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. MCSMX (72.7M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (1.01) vs FHKAX (0.86). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.83 vs. MCSMX (29.67). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.51 vs. MCSMX (-42.64).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.293 | 26.542 | 156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 72.7M | 2,197% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.01 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.83 | 29.67 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.61 | 21.07 | 487% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.51 | -42.64 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.42 | 37.39 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement