Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCSMX
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$47.61
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.35
Change+$0.27 (+2.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.26M
FHKAX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCSMX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MCSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MCSMX (66.3M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCSMX (1.14) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MCSMX (14 years). MCSMX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKAX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. FHKAX (32.50). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.66 vs. MCSMX (-41.54).
| FHKAX | MCSMX | FHKAX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.40 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.61 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.114 | 25.000 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 66.3M | 1,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.14 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.50 | 42.01 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.52 | -5.57 | -854% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.66 | -41.54 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.88 | 37.05 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement