Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCDFX
FHKAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$50.24
Change+$0.64 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
FHKAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. MCDFX (99.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCDFX (2.90) vs FHKAX (0.97). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FHKAX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.42 vs. FHKAX (43.97). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.39 vs. MCDFX (-0.40).
| FHKAX | MCDFX | FHKAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.32 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.32 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.581 | 28.279 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 99.4M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 2.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.97 | 48.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.49 | 22.28 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.39 | -0.40 | -1,099% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.86 | 45.29 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement