Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs MCDFX
FHKAX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs MCDFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$47.36
Change-$0.30 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.25
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
FHKAX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. MCDFX (95.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: MCDFX (3.08) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). MCDFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: FHKAX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.34 vs. FHKAX (29.86). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.00 vs. MCDFX (-6.19).
| FHKAX | MCDFX | FHKAX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.32 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.32 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.244 | 23.179 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.7M | 1,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 3.08 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.86 | 37.34 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.07 | 16.73 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.00 | -6.19 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.16 | 40.67 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement