Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs LNGZX
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$59.52
Change+$4.06 (+7.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$47.18
Change-$3.72 (-7.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.9M
FHKAX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. LNGZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and LNGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. LNGZX (49.9M). LNGZX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: LNGZX (1.81) vs FHKAX (1.44). FHKAX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FHKAX (18 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FHKAX (250) vs LNGZX (2000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.55 vs. LNGZX (28.32). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. LNGZX (-44.11).
| FHKAX | LNGZX | FHKAX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.24 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.49 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.879 | 2.232 | 487% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 49.9M | 4,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.81 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.55 | 28.32 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.73 | 7.66 | 924% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | -44.11 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.36 | 55.34 | 366% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement