Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs HLMCX
FHKAX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs HLMCX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$43.68
Change-$0.60 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.62
Change-$0.09 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99M
FHKAX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. HLMCX (2.99M). FHKAX (1.07) and HLMCX (1.07) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKAX (17 years) vs HLMCX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKAX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKAX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.20 vs. HLMCX (17.39).
| FHKAX | HLMCX | FHKAX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.16 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 4.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.433 | 7.736 | 199% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 2.99M | 41,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.07 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.20 | 17.39 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.14 | -21.69 | -139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.92 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers