Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs HLMCX
FHKAX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs HLMCX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.63
Change-$0.09 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.45M
FHKAX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. HLMCX (3.45M). HLMCX (0.88) and FHKAX (0.86) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKAX (17 years) vs HLMCX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKAX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKAX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.06 vs. HLMCX (23.73).
| FHKAX | HLMCX | FHKAX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.16 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 4.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.485 | 25.094 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 3.45M | 46,276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.88 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.06 | 23.73 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 101.45 | 19.78 | 513% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.88 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement