Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs HLMCX
FHKAX vs HLMCX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs HLMCX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$54.43
Change-$0.56 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.24M
FHKAX vs HLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. HLMCX (3.24M). HLMCX (0.88) and FHKAX (0.85) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than HLMCX: FHKAX (18 years) vs HLMCX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). HLMCX (31.00) and FHKAX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: FHKAX (0) vs HLMCX (100000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.85 vs. HLMCX (24.54).
| FHKAX | HLMCX | FHKAX / HLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.16 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 4.12 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.352 | 27.547 | 157% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 3.24M | 55,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.88 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.85 | 24.54 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.31 | 14.61 | 625% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.24 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement