Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSAFX
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$46.98
Change-$0.38 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$25.90
Change+$0.25 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.53M
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSAFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GSAFX (36.5M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: GSAFX (1.36) vs FHKAX (1.02). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs GSAFX (7 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKAX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.03 vs. FHKAX (29.86). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.00 vs. GSAFX (-27.08).
| FHKAX | GSAFX | FHKAX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.09 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.244 | 21.277 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 36.5M | 3,575% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.36 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.86 | 36.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.07 | 5.69 | 897% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.00 | -27.08 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers