Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSAFX
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.41
Change+$0.14 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.76
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.38M
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSAFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. GSAFX (40.4M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: GSAFX (1.21) vs FHKAX (0.88). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKAX (18 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKAX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.25 vs. GSAFX (29.18). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.43 vs. GSAFX (-28.44).
| FHKAX | GSAFX | FHKAX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.09 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.234 | 31.253 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 40.4M | 4,304% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.25 | 29.18 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.45 | 24.15 | 296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.43 | -28.44 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.67 | N/A | - |