Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSAFX
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$50.24
Change+$0.64 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$27.68
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSAFX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and GSAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GSAFX (39.1M). GSAFX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: GSAFX (1.25) vs FHKAX (0.97). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKAX (17 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKAX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). GSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.05 vs. FHKAX (43.86). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.42 vs. GSAFX (-20.39).
| FHKAX | GSAFX | FHKAX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.09 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.301 | 30.875 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.1M | 3,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.25 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.86 | 51.05 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.62 | 17.48 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.42 | -20.39 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement