Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GSAFX
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$59.52
Change+$4.06 (+7.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$28.86
Change-$0.55 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.23M
FHKAX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GSAFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and GSAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GSAFX (42.2M). GSAFX (1.45) and FHKAX (1.44) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKAX (18 years) vs GSAFX (8 years). GSAFX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKAX (250) vs GSAFX (5000000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.55 vs. GSAFX (36.66). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. GSAFX (-36.41).
| FHKAX | GSAFX | FHKAX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.879 | 4.301 | 253% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.45 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.55 | 36.66 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.73 | 17.46 | 405% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | -36.41 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement