Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GMEPX
FHKAX vs GMEPX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GMEPX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$50.24
Change+$0.64 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$27.69
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
FHKAX vs GMEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GMEPX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and GMEPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. GMEPX (39.3M). GMEPX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: GMEPX (1.25) vs FHKAX (0.97). FHKAX was incepted earlier than GMEPX: FHKAX (17 years) vs GMEPX (7 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). GMEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX (0) and GMEPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.76 vs. FHKAX (43.97). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.39 vs. GMEPX (-21.99).
| FHKAX | GMEPX | FHKAX / GMEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.09 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.581 | 29.915 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 39.3M | 3,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.25 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.97 | 49.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.49 | 16.62 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.39 | -21.99 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers