Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs GMEPX
FHKAX vs GMEPX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs GMEPX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$59.52
Change+$4.06 (+7.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$28.87
Change-$0.56 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.18M
FHKAX vs GMEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. GMEPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Hold and GMEPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. GMEPX (42.2M). GMEPX (1.46) and FHKAX (1.44) have matching dividends . FHKAX was incepted earlier than GMEPX: FHKAX (18 years) vs GMEPX (8 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). GMEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHKAX: GMEPX (0) vs FHKAX (250). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.55 vs. GMEPX (36.65). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. GMEPX (-36.41).
| FHKAX | GMEPX | FHKAX / GMEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.09 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.879 | 4.299 | 253% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 42.2M | 4,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.55 | 36.65 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.73 | 17.42 | 406% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | -36.41 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.36 | N/A | - |