Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHKAX vs FHKTX
FHKAX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts FHKAX vs FHKTX
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$49.60
Change+$0.66 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$49.12
Change+$0.66 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
FHKAX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKAX vs. FHKTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKAX is a Buy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX (1.39B) and FHKTX (1.39B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FHKAX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: FHKAX (0.97) vs FHKTX (0.88). FHKAX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: FHKAX (17 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). FHKAX (30.00) and FHKTX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. FHKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FHKTX (4%) vs FHKTX (4%). FHKAX (0) and FHKTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FHKAX (43.97) and FHKTX (43.60) have marching annual gain over last year. FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.39 vs. FHKTX (2.89).
| FHKAX | FHKTX | FHKAX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.43 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.43 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.581 | 27.359 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 1.39B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.88 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.97 | 43.60 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.49 | 56.26 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.39 | 2.89 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.86 | 86.26 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement