FHGDF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
103.09M
LIDR
Price
$0.75
Change
+$0.02 (+2.74%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.84M
Ad is loading...

FHGDF vs LIDR

Header iconFHGDF vs LIDR Comparison
Open Charts FHGDF vs LIDRBanner chart's image
Founder Holdings
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization103.09M
AEye
Price$0.75
Change+$0.02 (+2.74%)
Volume$320
Capitalization7.84M
FHGDF vs LIDR Comparison Chart
Loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHGDF vs. LIDR commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHGDF is a Hold and LIDR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FHGDF: $0.10 vs. LIDR: $0.73)
Brand notoriety: FHGDF and LIDR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHGDF: 100% vs. LIDR: 50%
Market capitalization -- FHGDF: $103.09M vs. LIDR: $7.84M
FHGDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $103.09M. LIDR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FHGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LIDR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIDR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LIDR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FHGDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LIDR (@Packaged Software) price change was +13.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +7.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIDR is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+7.79% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHGDF($103M) has a higher market cap than LIDR($7.84M). FHGDF YTD gains are higher at: -10.072 vs. LIDR (-42.205). FHGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. LIDR (-81.44M). FHGDF has more cash in the bank: 444M vs. LIDR (45.9M). FHGDF has less debt than LIDR: FHGDF (5.57M) vs LIDR (15.5M). FHGDF has higher revenues than LIDR: FHGDF (942M) vs LIDR (2.49M).
FHGDFLIDRFHGDF / LIDR
Capitalization103M7.84M1,314%
EBITDA15.6M-81.44M-19%
Gain YTD-10.072-42.20524%
P/E Ratio21.55N/A-
Revenue942M2.49M37,877%
Total Cash444M45.9M967%
Total Debt5.57M15.5M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHGDF: Fundamental Ratings
FHGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LIDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA284.9525.44
+9.80%
Tesla
GME27.460.38
+1.40%
GameStop Corp
SPY550.643.95
+0.72%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL209.280.91
+0.44%
Apple
BTC.X93754.840000-892.085940
-0.94%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

FHGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHGDF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHGDF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHGDF
1D Price
Change %
FHGDF100%
N/A
LIDR - FHGDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.65%
CCLD - FHGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISGIF - FHGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
API - FHGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
SSTI - FHGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More

LIDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIDR has been loosely correlated with REKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIDR jumps, then REKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIDR
1D Price
Change %
LIDR100%
+4.65%
REKR - LIDR
34%
Loosely correlated
+12.98%
ARBE - LIDR
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
NEOJF - LIDR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FHGDF - LIDR
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USIO - LIDR
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
More