FHGDF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.03 (+30.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
119.48M
LIDR
Price
$2.81
Change
+$0.01 (+0.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
112.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHGDF vs LIDR

Header iconFHGDF vs LIDR Comparison
Open Charts FHGDF vs LIDRBanner chart's image
Founder Holdings
Price$0.13
Change+$0.03 (+30.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization119.48M
AEye
Price$2.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
Volume$2.06M
Capitalization112.24M
FHGDF vs LIDR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FHGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHGDF vs. LIDR commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHGDF is a Hold and LIDR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FHGDF: $0.13 vs. LIDR: $2.81)
Brand notoriety: FHGDF and LIDR are both not notable
FHGDF represents the Packaged Software, while LIDR is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHGDF: 43% vs. LIDR: 8%
Market capitalization -- FHGDF: $119.48M vs. LIDR: $112.24M
FHGDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $119.48M. LIDR’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $112.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FHGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHGDF is a better buy in the long-term than LIDR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIDR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LIDR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHGDF is a better buy in the short-term than LIDR.

Price Growth

FHGDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LIDR (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHGDF($119M) has a higher market cap than LIDR($112M). LIDR YTD gains are higher at: 121.260 vs. FHGDF (15.144).
FHGDFLIDRFHGDF / LIDR
Capitalization119M112M106%
EBITDAN/A-32.2M-
Gain YTD15.144121.26012%
P/E Ratio32.22N/A-
RevenueN/A236K-
Total CashN/A19.2M-
Total DebtN/A3.06M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHGDF: Fundamental Ratings
FHGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHGDFLIDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAKOF4.770.12
+2.58%
Mako Mining Corp.
REMYY6.12N/A
+0.08%
Remy Cointreau SA
SWPFF2.69N/A
N/A
Swire Properties Ltd.
FTRCF0.24-0.02
-6.14%
The FUTR Corporation
BYDMF0.02N/A
-12.68%
BEYOND LITHIUM INC.

FHGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FHGDF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FHGDF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHGDF
1D Price
Change %
FHGDF100%
N/A
LIDR - FHGDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CCLD - FHGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
API - FHGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.64%
SSTI - FHGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.76%
KSIOF - FHGDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
More

LIDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIDR and ARBE have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIDR and ARBE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIDR
1D Price
Change %
LIDR100%
+0.36%
ARBE - LIDR
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
NEOJF - LIDR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AI - LIDR
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
FHGDF - LIDR
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BB - LIDR
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
More