Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHEQX vs RSLBX
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FHEQX vs RSLBX
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq A
Price$14.46
Change+$0.30 (+2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.25M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.37
Change+$0.07 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHEQX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHEQX is a StrongBuy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. FHEQX (103M). FHEQX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FHEQX (0.77) vs RSLBX (0.19). FHEQX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FHEQX (6 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FHEQX (1.54). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FHEQX (24.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHEQX: RSLBX (250) vs FHEQX (1500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. FHEQX (3.42). FHEQX return over 5 years is better than : 16.50 vs. RSLBX (-13.60).
| FHEQX | RSLBX | FHEQX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.74 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.74 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.812 | 4.820 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.19 | 402% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | 10.56 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.86 | 20.95 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.50 | -13.60 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement