Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHEQX vs RSLBX
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FHEQX vs RSLBX
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq A
Price$13.69
Change-$0.11 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.27
Change-$1.14 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.78B
FHEQX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHEQX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHEQX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.8B vs. FHEQX (98.2M). FHEQX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: FHEQX (1.02) vs RSLBX (0.06). FHEQX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: FHEQX (6 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FHEQX (1.51). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FHEQX (19.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FHEQX: RSLBX (250) vs FHEQX (1500). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. FHEQX (-2.28). FHEQX return over 5 years is better than : 23.40 vs. RSLBX (1.80).
| FHEQX | RSLBX | FHEQX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.75 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.75 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.695 | 11.252 | 15% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.2M | 81.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.06 | 1,835% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.28 | 6.71 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.31 | 28.12 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.40 | 1.80 | 1,298% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement