Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHEQ vs SFLR
FHEQ vs SFLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHEQ vs. SFLR commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHEQ is a Hold and SFLR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFLR has more net assets: 979M vs. FHEQ (507M). FHEQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SFLR: FHEQ (9.279) vs SFLR (7.939). FHEQ was incepted earlier than SFLR: FHEQ (1 year) vs SFLR (3 years). FHEQ (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than SFLR (0.89). FHEQ has a higher turnover SFLR (9.00) vs SFLR (9.00).
| FHEQ | SFLR | FHEQ / SFLR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.279 | 7.939 | 117% |
| Net Assets | 507M | 979M | 52% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.89 | 54% |
| Turnover | 86.00 | 9.00 | 956% |
| Yield | 0.74 | 0.40 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FHEQ | SFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FHEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHEQ has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHEQ jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHEQ | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| GS - FHEQ | 77% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| AMZN - FHEQ | 77% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MS - FHEQ | 76% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| TROW - FHEQ | 74% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| HLT - FHEQ | 73% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||
SFLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFLR has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFLR jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFLR | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| GS - SFLR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| MS - SFLR | 79% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| ARES - SFLR | 78% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| KKR - SFLR | 77% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| DOV - SFLR | 76% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||