Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FHEQ vs HELO
FHEQ vs HELO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHEQ vs. HELO commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHEQ is a Hold and HELO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HELO has more net assets: 3.39B vs. FHEQ (507M). FHEQ has a higher annual dividend yield than HELO: FHEQ (9.279) vs HELO (3.994). FHEQ was incepted earlier than HELO: FHEQ (1 year) vs HELO (2 years). FHEQ (0.48) and HELO (0.50) have comparable expense ratios . FHEQ has a higher turnover HELO (30.00) vs HELO (30.00).
| FHEQ | HELO | FHEQ / HELO | |
| Gain YTD | 9.279 | 3.994 | 232% |
| Net Assets | 507M | 3.39B | 15% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.50 | 96% |
| Turnover | 86.00 | 30.00 | 287% |
| Yield | 0.74 | 0.66 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FHEQ | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FHEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHEQ has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHEQ jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHEQ | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| GS - FHEQ | 77% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| AMZN - FHEQ | 77% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MS - FHEQ | 76% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| TROW - FHEQ | 74% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| HLT - FHEQ | 73% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||
HELO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HELO has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HELO jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HELO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HELO | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| GS - HELO | 79% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| DOV - HELO | 78% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| ADI - HELO | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMP - HELO | 76% Closely correlated | -4.42% | ||
| BX - HELO | 76% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||